Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

24- and 36-Week Outcomes for the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS)

  • John Piacentini
  • , Shannon Bennett
  • , Scott N. Compton
  • , Phillip C. Kendall
  • , Boris Birmaher
  • , Anne Marie Albano
  • , John March
  • , Joel Sherrill
  • , Dara Sakolsky
  • , Golda Ginsburg
  • , Moira Rynn
  • , R. Lindsey Bergman
  • , Elizabeth Gosch
  • , Bruce Waslick
  • , Satish Iyengar
  • , James McCracken
  • , John T. Walkup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE : We report active treatment group differences on response and remission rates and changes in anxiety severity at weeks 24 and 36 for the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS).

METHOD : CAMS youth (N = 488; 74% ≤12 years of age) with DSM-IV separation, generalized, or social anxiety disorder were randomized to 12 weeks of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), sertraline (SRT), CBT+SRT (COMB), or medication management/pill placebo (PBO). Responders attended 6 monthly booster sessions in their assigned treatment arm; youth in COMB and SRT continued on their medication throughout this period. Efficacy of COMB, SRT, and CBT (n = 412) was assessed at 24 and 36 weeks postrandomization. Youth randomized to PBO (n = 76) were offered active CAMS treatment if nonresponsive at week 12 or over follow-up and were not included here. Independent evaluators blind to study condition assessed anxiety severity, functioning, and treatment response. Concomitant treatments were allowed but monitored over follow-up.

RESULTS : The majority (>80%) of acute responders maintained positive response at both weeks 24 and 36. Consistent with acute outcomes, COMB maintained advantage over CBT and SRT, which did not differ, on dimensional outcomes; the 3 treatments did not differ on most categorical outcomes over follow-up. Compared to COMB and CBT, youth in SRT obtained more concomitant psychosocial treatments, whereas those in SRT and CBT obtained more concomitant combined (medication plus psychosocial) treatment.

CONCLUSIONS : COMB maintained advantage over CBT and SRT on some measures over follow-up, whereas the 2 monotherapies remained indistinguishable. The observed convergence of COMB and monotherapy may be related to greater use of concomitant treatment during follow-up among youth receiving the monotherapies, although other explanations are possible. Although outcomes were variable, most CAMS-treated youth experienced sustained treatment benefit. Clinical trial registration information-Child and Adolescent Anxiety Disorders (CAMS); URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00052078.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume53
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Keywords

  • Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS)
  • anxiety
  • cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
  • follow-up
  • selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)

Disciplines

  • Medicine and Health Sciences

Cite this