Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An open-label, long-term evaluation of the safety, efficacy and tolerability of avanafil in male patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction

  • Laurence Belkoff
  • , A. McCullough
  • , I. Goldstein
  • , L. Jones
  • , C. H. Bowden
  • , K. Didonato
  • , B. Trask
  • , W. W. Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: Determine the long-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of avanafil, a highly specific, rapidly absorbed phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor in male patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction (ED), with or without diabetes. Methods: This was a 52-week, open-label extension of two 12-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Patients were assigned to avanafil 100 mg, but could request 200 mg (for increased efficacy; '100/200-mg' group) or 50 mg (for improved tolerability). Primary end points included percentage of sexual attempts ending in successful vaginal penetration [Sexual Encounter Profile 2 (SEP2)] and intercourse (SEP3) and erectile function domain score per the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF). Results: Some 712 patients enrolled; 686 were included in the intent to treat population and contributed to the data. All primary end points showed sustained improvement. SEP2 and SEP3 success rates improved from 44% to 83% and from 13% to 68% (100-mg group) and from 43% to 79% and from 11% to 66% (100/200-mg group), respectively. Mean IIEF-EF domain scores improved from 13.6 to 22.2 (100-mg group) and from 11.9 to 22.7 (100/200-mg group). Avanafil was effective in some patients = 15 min and > 6 h postdose. Sixty-five per cent (112/172) of 'nonresponders' to avanafil 100 mg responded to the 200-mg dose. The most common (= 2%) treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, flushing, nasopharyngitis and nasal congestion; < 3% of patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events. Conclusions: The long-term tolerability and improvement in sexual function, coupled with rapid onset, suggest that avanafil is well suited for the on-demand treatment of ED. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalInternational journal of clinical practice
Volume67
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Keywords

  • Dose-Response Relationship
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug
  • Humans
  • International Index of Erectile Function
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors
  • Pyrimidines
  • Treatment Outcome
  • adult
  • age
  • aged
  • article
  • avanafil
  • backache
  • controlled study
  • disease duration
  • disease severity
  • dizziness
  • double blind procedure
  • drug dose escalation
  • drug dose increase
  • drug efficacy
  • drug induced headache
  • drug safety
  • drug tolerability
  • drug withdrawal
  • erectile dysfunction
  • faintness
  • flushing
  • hearing impairment
  • human
  • influenza
  • insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • major clinical study
  • male
  • non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • nose obstruction
  • open study
  • penis erection
  • phase 3 clinical trial
  • placebo
  • priapism
  • priority journal
  • race
  • randomized controlled trial
  • rhinopharyngitis
  • sexual intercourse
  • side effect

Disciplines

  • Urology

Cite this