Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Defining Treatment Response and Remission in Child Anxiety: Signal Detection Analysis Using the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale

  • Nicole E. Caporino
  • , Douglas M. Brodman
  • , Philip C. Kendall
  • , Anne Marie Albano
  • , Joel Sherrill
  • , John Piacentini
  • , Dara Sakolsky
  • , Boris Birmaher
  • , Scott N. Compton
  • , Golda Ginsburg
  • , Moira Rynn
  • , James McCracken
  • , Elizabeth A. Gosch
  • , Courtney Pierce Keeton
  • , John March
  • , John T. Walkup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) percent reduction and raw score cut-offs for predicting treatment response and remission among children and adolescents with anxiety disorders.

METHOD: Data were from a subset of youth (N = 438; 7-17 years of age) who participated in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS), a multi-site, randomized controlled trial that examined the relative efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; Coping Cat), medication (sertraline [SRT]), their combination, and pill placebo for the treatment of separation anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social phobia. The clinician-rated PARS was administered pre- and posttreatment (delivered over 12 weeks). Quality receiver operating characteristic methods assessed the performance of various PARS percent reductions and absolute cut-off scores in predicting treatment response and remission, as determined by posttreatment ratings on the Clinical Global Impression scales and the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV. Corresponding change in impairment was evaluated using the Child Anxiety Impact Scale.

RESULTS: Reductions of 35% and 50% on the six-item PARS optimally predicted treatment response and remission, respectively. Post-treatment PARS raw scores of 8 to 10 optimally predicted remission. Anxiety improved as a function of PARS-defined treatment response and remission.

CONCLUSIONS: Results serve as guidelines for operationalizing treatment response and remission in future research and in making cross-study comparisons. These guidelines can facilitate translation of research findings into clinical practice.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume52
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Disciplines

  • Child Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medicine and Health Sciences
  • Pediatrics

Cite this