The Efficacy of Participation in a Survivorship Program on Functional Abilities and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Descriptive, Retrospective Study

Phillip B Palmer; Katie Wallace; David Clay; Corey Gill; Kelly Moore

The Efficacy of Participation in a Survivorship Program on Functional Abilities and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Descriptive, Retrospective Study

Phillip B Palmer, Katie Wallace, David Clay, Corey Gill, Kelly Moore

Department of Physical Therapy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Cancer survival rates are increasing and survivors are living with the negative effects of cancer and its treatments resulting in decreased quality of life (QOL). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of participation in a survivorship program on QOL. Design: This study was a case series. Methods: Medical records of 8 individuals were reviewed. Data collected included type of cancer, date of diagnosis, reasons for referral, medical treatment, description of the rehabilitation program, results of the initial and final examinations, and demographic data. Outcomes included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy &hyphen; Fatigue (FACIT&hyphen;F), Numeric Rating Scales for pain and fatigue, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, Six&hyphen;Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). Data Analysis: Only subjects who had values for initial and follow&hyphen;up tests for the outcomes were included in the analysis. Differences between the initial and follow&hyphen;up values were calculated and categorized. Change scores were compared with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or the minimal detectable change (MDC) reported in the literature. Results: On 4 of the variables (Tinetti, FACIT&hyphen;F, TUG, 6MWT &hyphen; distance), 60% or more of the subjects improved. Two of 4 individuals had values that exceeded the MCID on the 6MWT&hyphen;D. Conclusions: The results suggest that survivorship programs may have a positive impact on QOL. More research should be done. Limitations: The small sample size and missing data made drawing definitive conclusions difficult.

Original language	American English
Journal	Rehabilitation Oncology
Volume	33
State	Published - Jan 1 2015

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Cite this

@article{cd9618cd8ebc44a08fc6fca01d226d6a,

title = "The Efficacy of Participation in a Survivorship Program on Functional Abilities and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Descriptive, Retrospective Study",

abstract = " Background: Cancer survival rates are increasing and survivors are living with the negative effects of cancer and its treatments resulting in decreased quality of life (QOL). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of participation in a survivorship program on QOL. Design: This study was a case series. Methods: Medical records of 8 individuals were reviewed. Data collected included type of cancer, date of diagnosis, reasons for referral, medical treatment, description of the rehabilitation program, results of the initial and final examinations, and demographic data. Outcomes included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy &hyphen; Fatigue (FACIT&hyphen;F), Numeric Rating Scales for pain and fatigue, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, Six&hyphen;Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). Data Analysis: Only subjects who had values for initial and follow&hyphen;up tests for the outcomes were included in the analysis. Differences between the initial and follow&hyphen;up values were calculated and categorized. Change scores were compared with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or the minimal detectable change (MDC) reported in the literature. Results: On 4 of the variables (Tinetti, FACIT&hyphen;F, TUG, 6MWT &hyphen; distance), 60% or more of the subjects improved. Two of 4 individuals had values that exceeded the MCID on the 6MWT&hyphen;D. Conclusions: The results suggest that survivorship programs may have a positive impact on QOL. More research should be done. Limitations: The small sample size and missing data made drawing definitive conclusions difficult. ",

author = "Palmer, {Phillip B} and Katie Wallace and David Clay and Corey Gill and Kelly Moore",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "33",

journal = "Rehabilitation Oncology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Efficacy of Participation in a Survivorship Program on Functional Abilities and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Descriptive, Retrospective Study

AU - Palmer, Phillip B

AU - Wallace, Katie

AU - Clay, David

AU - Gill, Corey

AU - Moore, Kelly

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Cancer survival rates are increasing and survivors are living with the negative effects of cancer and its treatments resulting in decreased quality of life (QOL). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of participation in a survivorship program on QOL. Design: This study was a case series. Methods: Medical records of 8 individuals were reviewed. Data collected included type of cancer, date of diagnosis, reasons for referral, medical treatment, description of the rehabilitation program, results of the initial and final examinations, and demographic data. Outcomes included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy &hyphen; Fatigue (FACIT&hyphen;F), Numeric Rating Scales for pain and fatigue, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, Six&hyphen;Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). Data Analysis: Only subjects who had values for initial and follow&hyphen;up tests for the outcomes were included in the analysis. Differences between the initial and follow&hyphen;up values were calculated and categorized. Change scores were compared with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or the minimal detectable change (MDC) reported in the literature. Results: On 4 of the variables (Tinetti, FACIT&hyphen;F, TUG, 6MWT &hyphen; distance), 60% or more of the subjects improved. Two of 4 individuals had values that exceeded the MCID on the 6MWT&hyphen;D. Conclusions: The results suggest that survivorship programs may have a positive impact on QOL. More research should be done. Limitations: The small sample size and missing data made drawing definitive conclusions difficult.

AB - Background: Cancer survival rates are increasing and survivors are living with the negative effects of cancer and its treatments resulting in decreased quality of life (QOL). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of participation in a survivorship program on QOL. Design: This study was a case series. Methods: Medical records of 8 individuals were reviewed. Data collected included type of cancer, date of diagnosis, reasons for referral, medical treatment, description of the rehabilitation program, results of the initial and final examinations, and demographic data. Outcomes included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy &hyphen; Fatigue (FACIT&hyphen;F), Numeric Rating Scales for pain and fatigue, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, Six&hyphen;Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). Data Analysis: Only subjects who had values for initial and follow&hyphen;up tests for the outcomes were included in the analysis. Differences between the initial and follow&hyphen;up values were calculated and categorized. Change scores were compared with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or the minimal detectable change (MDC) reported in the literature. Results: On 4 of the variables (Tinetti, FACIT&hyphen;F, TUG, 6MWT &hyphen; distance), 60% or more of the subjects improved. Two of 4 individuals had values that exceeded the MCID on the 6MWT&hyphen;D. Conclusions: The results suggest that survivorship programs may have a positive impact on QOL. More research should be done. Limitations: The small sample size and missing data made drawing definitive conclusions difficult.

UR - https://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/scholarly_papers/1858

M3 - Article

VL - 33

JO - Rehabilitation Oncology

JF - Rehabilitation Oncology

ER -

The Efficacy of Participation in a Survivorship Program on Functional Abilities and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Descriptive, Retrospective Study

Abstract

Disciplines

Other files and links

Cite this