The impact of post-operative enteral nutrition on duodenal injury outcomes: A post hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter trial.

Rachel L Choron, Michael Rallo, Charoo Piplani, Sara Youssef, Amanda L Teichman, Christopher G Bargoud, Jason D Sciarretta, Randi N Smith, Dustin S Hanos, Iman N Afif, Jessica H Beard, Navpreet K Dhillon, Ashling Zhang, Mira Ghneim, Rebekah J Devasahayam, Oliver L Gunter, Alison A Smith, Brandi L Sun, Chloe Cao, Jessica K ReynoldsLauren A Hilt, Daniel Holena, Grace Chang, Meghan Jonikas, Karla Echeverria, Nathaniel Fung, Aaron Anderson, Ryan P Dumas, Caitlin A Fitzgerald, Jeremy Levin, Christine Trankiem, JaeHee Jane Yoon, Jacqueline Blank, Joshua Hazelton, Christopher J McLaughlin, Rami Al-Aref, Jordan M Kirsch, Daniel S Howard, Dane R Scantling, Kate Dellonte, Michael Vella, Brent Hopkins, Chloe Shell, Pascal O Udekwu, Evan G Wong, Bellal A Joseph, Howard Lieberman, Walter Ramsey, Collin Stewart, Claudia Alvarez, John D Berne, Jeffry Nahmias, Ivan Puente, J Pat Patton, Ilya Rakitin, Lindsey L Perea, Odessa R Pulido, Hashim Ahmed, Jane Keating, Lisa Kodadek, Jason Wade, Reynold Henry, Martin Schreiber, Andrew Benjamin, Abid Khan, Laura K Mann, Caleb Mentzer, Vasileios Mousafeiris, Francesk Mulita, Shari Reid-Gruner, Erica Sais, Christopher Foote, Carlos Palacio-Lascano, Dias Argandykov, Haytham Kaafarani, Michelle Bover Manderski, Mayur Narayan, Mark J Seamon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leak following surgical repair of traumatic duodenal injuries results in prolonged hospitalization and oftentimes nil per os(NPO) treatment. Parenteral nutrition(PN) has known morbidity; however, duodenal leak(DL) patients often have complex injuries and hospital courses resulting in barriers to enteral nutrition(EN). We hypothesized EN alone would be associated with 1)shorter duration until leak closure and 2)less infectious complications and shorter hospital length of stay(HLOS) compared to PN.

METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a retrospective, multicenter study from 35 Level-1 trauma centers, including patients >14 years-old who underwent surgery for duodenal injuries(1/2010-12/2020) and endured post-operative DL. The study compared nutrition strategies: EN vs PN vs EN + PN using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests; if significance was found pairwise comparison or Dunn's test were performed.

RESULTS: There were 113 patients with DL: 43 EN, 22 PN, and 48 EN + PN. Patients were young(median age 28 years-old) males(83.2%) with penetrating injuries(81.4%). There was no difference in injury severity or critical illness among the groups, however there were more pancreatic injuries among PN groups. EN patients had less days NPO compared to both PN groups(12 days[IQR23] vs 40[54] vs 33[32],p = p = 0.008). Enteral nutrition patients had less intra-abdominal abscesses, bacteremia, and days with drains than the PN groups (all p < 0.05). Hospital length of stay was shorter among EN patients versus both PN groups (27 days [24] vs. 44 [62] days vs. 45 [31] days, p = 0.001). When controlling for predictors of leak, regression analysis demonstrated that EN was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (β = −24.9; 95% confidence interval, −39.0 to −10.7; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: EN was associated with a shorter duration until leak closure, less infectious complications, and shorter length of stay. Contrary to some conventional thought, PN was not associated with decreased time until leak closure. We therefore suggest EN should be the preferred choice of nutrition in patients with duodenal leaks whenever feasible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; IV.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2024

Cite this